Cycle of seasons


Spilling its richness
everywhere
spring caresses the
waters of the pools,
and coaxes the lily buds
to emerge unscathed.

Clouds clash
and thunder resounds like
the beat of drums.
Shiva's colourful bow
glitters across the sky
while the lightning
serves for a string.

Just 1411 left.


Our national animal is fighting for its life.
From around 40,000 at the turn of the last century, there are just 1411 tigers left in India.
If we don’t act now, we could lose this part of our heritage forever.
Speak up, blog, share the concern, stay informed… Every little bit helps.

SAVE THE TIGER.... SAVE THE FOREST...SAVE OUR CLIMATE...SAVE INDIA



Issued in support of Panthera tigris ,and its forest home,So vital to our battle against climate change.

She's Alive... Beautiful... Finite... Hurting... Worth Dying for.

India Since Independence.


More than for most countries, Indian history since 1950 has been a prisoner of politics. Nation-building, identity-building, and economy-building have all been politically divisive projects; and thus history-building is, too."India Since Independence"by Bipan Chandra is one of the best books I have read and is a sequel to "India's Struggle for Independence", which is a must for any civil services aspirant.Though Chandra’s book suffers from an over-fidelity to the preferred Congress history,it makes up for it with insightful information.For those who are interested but put off by the thickness of the book, here is the summary..I guess it covers all aspects of the book in a very concise manner.

Celebrating its Independence on 15 August, India was faced with immense problems posed by the transfer of power, Partition and Partition riots and the immense refugee exodus from Pakistan to India. Still the Government of India and the Indian people set out to develop an independent modern economy and a secular, democratic, civil libertarian and socially just polity and society.

The newly framed Constitution came into operation on 26 January 1950, establishing India as an independent republic based on a system of representative parliamentary democracy. An outstanding feature of the new political system was adult franchise for all men and women. The Constitution also established an advanced system of personal and civil liberties to be enforced by an independent judiciary. The workers, peasants, agricultural labourers and clerical and other lower middle class employees were given the right to form unions and associations and to organize movements of social protest.

The Constitution guaranteed equality before the law to all citizens, prohibited any discrimination on grounds of religion, race, caste, sex or place of birth, and assured full freedom of religion. It also provided for a federal structure with a strong centre but also a great deal of autonomy for the states. Parliament was made the institution where basic and ultimate power resided.

India's all-India services like the Indian Administrative Service and the officers and ranks of its armed forces are recruited from all the the regions and linguistic areas of the country. The armed forces and the central services are highly professional and non political and execute the orders of the elected government.

India's democracy came into its own with the first general election held in 1951-52. These elections were the biggest experiment in democracy in human history. The fair and peaceful conduct of the poll showed that the democratic system had taken roots in India. The effort to build a democratic and civil libertarian political order in a socially, culturally and economically backward and highly unequal society was unique by any historical standards. And India is the only Third World Country to have a continuous record of political democracy and civil liberties for a long period of 50 years after Independence.

A major problem India has faced since 1947 has been that of national unity or consolidation of the nation. Perhaps being culturally the most diverse country in the world, it has been open to continuous challenges to its unity. The founders of the Republic realised that the Indian people had to be unified by accepting its immense diversity. And so they began the consolidation of the nation around the concept of 'unity in diversity.'

A major aspect of the territorial and administrative unification of India was the integration of more than 560 large and small princely states, which occupied nearly 40 per cent of the territory if colonial India. With great skill and masterful diplomacy using both persuasion and pressure, Sardar Patel, the home minister, succeeded in integrating all but three of them -- Junagadh, Hyderabad and Jammu and Kashmir -- with the Indian Union by 15 August 1947. Firm action against the Nawabs of Junagadh and Hyderabad, and the armed defence of Kashmir against a Pakistani-sponsored invasion led to the merger of these states with India by the end of 1948.

By 1953, the problem of the rehabilitation of the refugees from Pakistan and their full integration with the Indian people had also been successfully tackled.

The language problem was the most divine issue in the first 20 years of Independent Indian -- one language problem was that of the official language of the country. It was, of course, accepted by the Indian leaders that Indian was a multi-lingual country and it had to remain so. The Constitution, therefore, recognised all the major languages as India's national languages. But it also decided that Hindi would be India's official language, with English being used for official purposes till 1965 when it would be replaced by Hindi. But as time for the changeover to Hindi came nearer, there were agitations galore and even occasional violence by both the supporters and the opponents of the changeover.

Fully aware of the danger that the controversy could pose to Indian polity, the central leadership worked for a compromise. In the end, the entire issue was defused when Parliament adopted a bill in December 1967 providing that the use of English as an associate official language would continue as long as the non-Hindi states wanted it.

The reorganisation of the multi-lingual states of the Union on the basis of language was another contentious issue that came on the agenda very soon after Independence. The leadership was reluctant to disturb the status quo for some time to come, but it soon yielded as public opinion in the country was overwhelmingly in favour of linguistic states. Today, nearly all the Indian states are formed around a dominant language.

The task of integrating millions of tribal people, divided into hundreds of tribes, constituting over 6 per cent of India's population and dispersed all over the country, was extremely complex. The Indian leadership rejected the two alternative policies of letting the tribal people stay more or less as they were or of assimilating them completely into the neighbouring Indian society in the name of 'uplifting' them. Instead, it adopted the policy of making them an integral part of the Indian nation even while maintaining their distinct identity and culture. As Jawaharlal Nehru, the architect of India's tribal policy, put it, 'The tribal areas have to progress' and 'they have to progress in their own way.'

The tribal people in North-Eastern India demanded greater autonomy and in case of the Nagas and the Mizos even started insurrectionary movements for independence. The Government of India responded with a two track response. While willing to extend greater autonomy, it would not tolerate secession from India, nor would it give way to violence. In the end, four tribal states were formed in the North-East: Nagaland in 1963, Meghalaya in 1972, and Arunachal Pradesh and Mizoram in 1987.

A major national task after Independence was to undo the damage done to the economy by colonialism and to initiate economic development on the basis of the most advanced technology in agriculture and industry.

Land reforms had been one of the major promises of the national movement. In the early 1950s, the different state governments framed laws abolishing the zamindars, landlords, and other intermediaries between the state and the cultivators and made the existing tenants the owners of land. While hardly benefiting the landless agricultural labourers, agrarian legislation did mark a basic transformation of agrarian relations. The semi-feudal agrarian structure has disappeared from most parts of the country. Moreover, zamindari abolition put large chunks of land in the hands of the old rent-paying tenants many of whom, along with the erstwhile zamindars, have taken to capitalist farming as rich peasants or as large-scale farmers. Increasingly, over the years, political and social power in the rural areas has also passed into the hands of these new strata of capitalist farmers and rich and middle peasants, who, along with the urban capitalist class and the middle classes, constitute the political ruling class of the country.

Along with the land reform, the most urgent task was to overcome India's industrial backwardness -- the share of modern industries in national income at the end of British rule was only 7.5 per cent. In 1950, the central government took the most important step of setting up the Planning Commission and initiated other active measures for planned economic development. With the Second Five Year Plan, from 1956 to 1961, emphasis of government economic policy shifted to rapid industrialisation - based on the development of heavy, capital goods industry, even while encouraging small scale industry, and state ownership and control of the commanding heights of the economy.

The private sector was, however, not to be eliminated. Under government direction, regulation and licensing, it was to play an important role in economic development. India was thus to have a mixed economy, with the public sector gradually dominating it. There was, however, a major shift in the government's economic policy in 1991 when liberalisation of the economy, initiated in 1980, went full speed ahead. The system of controls and licence was mostly disseminated and the public sector started retreating.

Indian agriculture has made sturdy progress since 1950, growing at a slightly higher than 2.5 per cent rate per year. The Green Revolution, based on new seed-fertiliser technology, was introduced in the 1960s. It has gradually spread to all parts of the country except the rain-fed non-irrigated dry land areas. Industry has grown nearly 12 times since 1950. The annual rate of overall economic growth has been 3.75 per cent between 1950 and 1980, about 5 per cent between 1980 and 1990 and nearly 7 per cent since 1994.

It is on the front of greater economic equality and the removal of poverty, illiteracy and disease that India has faltered since 1947.

All the major political parties in India have been committed to the eradication of social inequality, discrimination and oppression. The Constitution provided for reservations in educational institutions, legislatures, and employment in government service for the scheduled castes and Scheduled Tribes. The provision of reservations in educational institutions and government employment was extended to backward castes and classes first in many states and later at the Centre.

In 1955, the Hindu Code Bill was passed enforcing monogamy on both men and women, permitting divorce to both and granting women equal rights with men in inheritance of property. However, Muslim orthodoxy succeeded in preventing the passage of a similar law for the protection of Muslim women.

Unfortunately, however, no social movements against the hierarchical caste system or for gender equality were organised, and the momentum of social reforms was lost by the early 1950s. The result is that the scheduled castes and women continue to suffer social and economic oppression especially in the rural areas.

Independent India has been committed to secularism. Despite the Partition of India in 1947 and the attendant communal riots, Indian leaders did not give way to communalism and made secularism a basic pillar to India's Constitution as also its state and society. They were helped in this by the revulsion in the country against the assassination of Mahatma Gandhi in January 1948 by a Hindu communal fanatic. After 1986, communalism has had a certain resurgence because of the feelings aroused by the Babri Mosque-Ram Janambhoomi dispute. One result was the destruction of the mosque on December 6, 1992.

From the outset, India has followed an independent foreign policy based on non-alignment and anti-colonialism. Foreign policy has been used to defend and strengthen India's Independence and to promote world peace. During the Cold War, India firmly refused to get involved in it and opposed the policy of dividing the world into hostile power blocs. It also tried to lessen the mutual antagonism of the big powers. During the Nehru and Indira Gandhi years, India's foreign policy also contributed to a sense of national pride among the people and thus contributed to national cohesion.

Bring On The Thali


Andhra Bhavan, Feroz Shah Road ,New Delhi.

If you have not been already then please go because I do not know what you are waiting for. Great value for money. The first thing you notice about the place is the mass of humanity determinedly walking towards the canteen. You realize, nearly the whole world seems to share your love for the Andhra thali. You bravely overcome your fear of crowds, the promise of a good meal being the overpowering emotion. The Vegetarian Thali with all its dals, chutneys and vegetables is a must try.Apart from this they have Fish Fry - which is good if you want something milder with the rest of your fiery meal.People can hardly finish their meal and walk out swaying like drunks, a big grin pasted on their faces. Yes, it is possible to get high on Rasam and all things zesty.

Separation Of Hearts



Dead is the day when she was one with me
as I with her;
Now,I am I and she is she again,
not one but twain;
Too fierce for my faint heart to bear
the flames of this dividing fire!
My paper is awash with tears,
and blotted by the shaken ink,
and my pain tortured mind forbids,
me to write or think.

What cause gave we for the malignity,
O Destiny?

Disclaimer:  This is a figment of my imagination.. had to clarify this after sooo many queries about my break up with my imaginary girlfriend :P Lol

Snoozy

New Socialism


In the history of modern India,three public figures who influenced me the most in my thinking and outlook are Subhas Chandra Bose,Jawaharlal Nehru and Dr.Ram manohar Lohia.Its no surprise that they were all true socialists and not the pseudos who clamour for votes today in the name of socialism.I completed reading an autobiography of Dr. Lohia and my interest in his view of socialism only increased manifolds.However there are few things about him which I abhored.-Political militancy, Anti Nehruism,his views on official language,caste based agitations,alliance with communal forces and so on...

Once Dr. Ram Manohar Lohia said, “I have nothing with me except that the common and the poor people of India think that I am perhaps their own man.” According to Lohia, socialism in India began with Gandhiji’s thought and action. He was greatly influenced by Gandhiji’s ideals, values and methods. He held Gandhiji’s “Satyagraha” and “non-co-operation” as original creation of 20th century. Lohia wanted the doctrine of socialism to be enriched by Gandhism. Socialism not only meant removal of poverty and inequality but also character-building and reform of the individual. It thus emphasizes upon spiritualism. But spiritualism alone is not socialism. Socialism implies a synthesis between spiritualism and materialism, social reform and individual reform.

Lohia saw no opposition between the social and the individual, as the individual is both an end and a means.

Lohia was aware of the limitations of Gandhism. But he held Gandhism to be an open doctrine. He believed that a rationalistic application of Gandhian propositions will strengthen the cause of Indian socialism. He tried to integrate the Gandhian technique of Satyagraha and the socialist principle of class struggle.

He also differentiated “Sarvodaya” from socialism. It as a distortion of socialism, as he did not contain the method of social change. He held Sarvodaya as the greatest fraud of the 20th century. He was also a critic of the Bhoodan movement of Vinoba Bhave, as it did not prescribe and comprehensive formula to solve the land problem.

Lohia also opposed communism. It was associated with perversions and distortions. Communism favoured violence, centralization, loss of human freedom. He agreed with Marxism in so far as it regarded class struggle as the dynamics of social change. But he disagreed with the aims and methods of communism and so considered it to be unsuitable for India.

Lohia was a critic of socialism as enunciated by Nehru. It started from around 1928. Nehru had considered that a sort of leftist nationalism was necessary for an effective struggle for independence. Till the death of Gandhiji, Lohia hoped that there would be a socialist transformation of the Congress. But he was soon disillusioned. He, therefore, wanted to build a progressive and dynamic alternative which could bring about to build a progressive and dynamic alternative which could bring about a radical transformation in the country. Lohia held that the greatest flaw of Nehru’s socialism lay in this fact. Its source of inspiration did not lie in the removal of poverty and inequality through social reform or socialization of wealth’s.

Thus Lohia held that in post-independence India socialism was sponsored by the State and come to be identified with industrialization and modernization. Even if the new industries are being owned by the State, some people continue to get special privileges. In fact, it contains the evils of both capitalism and socialism. True socialization, implies socialization of wealth. Mere State takeover of industries did not imply this. He also emphasized upon the socio-cultural features of socialism. Hence although nationalization could usher in socialism in the Soviet Union, India was burdened with evils emanating from differences in caste, creed, religion, language etc. So unless these barriers were removed, economic, equality could not be attained. Hence what was necessary was to remove these evils from the Indian society before socialism could be established.

According to Lohia, the root cause of all socio-economic evils is the attachment for wealth and property. The lust for wealth was quite profound in India. Lohia’s socialist tents emphasize both on material and spiritual aspects of life. As long as property remains, personal attachment for property could not be removed. Hence, although a person could own property for personal sue, all wealth and means of production in industry and agriculture should be nationalized.

He rightly held "we have to enhance wealth, expand agriculture, increase factories but we should think in terms of increasing collective wealth; if we try to end the love for private property, we might be able to establish a new-socialism in India."

(( Brief Bio:
Dr. Ram Manohar Lohia was born at Akbarpur in U.P. on March 23, 1910 and died on October 12, 1967. He received his higher education at the Benares Hindu University and in Calcutta. He obtained his Ph.D degree in economics in 1932 from Berlin University. Upon his return to India in 1933 he joined the freedom movement at a young age. He was associated with the Congress Socialist Party in the Congress in I934. With the formation of the P.S.P. in 1952, he was with it for a few years. Later on when the Samyukta Socialist Party came into existence, he joined it. He died in 1967.

Lohia was a great orator. He was also a prolific writer. Some of his important works were "Aspects of Socialist Policy" (1952), Marx, Gandhi and Socialism (1962), The Caste System (1964), Fragments of World Mind (1966), etc. Besides, he had wide interest in history, philoso­phy, literature and painting, etc , as well.)))

Why the greens miss Jairam Ramesh.


What distinguishes a visible minister from an invisible one is that the former takes decisions that matter. Some turn out to be stupid decisions. Sometimes, they run contrary to the plans of the political party leadership. But a good minister must take contrary decisions and make frank statements. And the public must believe that the minister likes to use his brains. Even if his thinking is not in alignment with our own hopes and fears. But at least, let him apply himself to the task at hand, enforce rules, ask questions.

Until recently, the MoEF was barely visible in everyday governance. Usually, the ministries we heard from were Home, Finance or Defence. But debates over displacement, pollution and the right of ecology itself to survive, unmolested, have become uncomfortably hot in India.

But I’m not mourning his transfer to Rural Development. Visible ministers are desperately needed in every ministry.And as for the MoEF, we can only hope Natarajan will similarly consult her conscience while taking decisions on environment.

Infant Jesus of Prague

Shirdi Sai Baba


Shri Sai Baba is the essence and embodiment of spiritual enlightenment and religious harmony. He awakened people to the eternal truth. "Sabka Malik Ek" (One God governs all). He wanted to provide each one with two powerful implements to make them stronger and wiser - 'One' being 'Shraddha' (Faith) and other being 'Saburi' (Patience). Om sai nath.

The Unanswered Question


what is good and why is there evil? What are love and hate? Who are we, why are we here, and where are we going? Who lit this flame in us? "How do we get back to those blue hills?" Perhaps the movie's final, lasting image embraces all we know: From the mud grows the lotus.

In fact, juxtaposing the beautiful and the ugly is the device used here. From a lush, green tropical forest crawls a deadly, green crocodile; the hauntingly lovely songs of a Melanesian choir hover near scenes of mass destruction;an owl patiently watches the killing beneath it.Butterfly perched upon a rotting human skull;

Ultimately, the film is a succession of vivid and subjective set pieces, a series of enduring visions that bring back whatever we choose to make of them.

Objectivist philosophy


"Who is John Galt?" A seemingly rhetorical question that is oft asked among the members of the society described by Ayn Rand.

A fantastic novel that includes a cast of wealthy characters who are viewed as "evil and selfish" by the government, media and the rest of society. Many of these characters earn their wealth thru vison, initiative and hard work...true capitalism. Their sucess is held against them by those who are not as driven or successful. A man named Galt with a brilliant mind leads a quasi-rebellion aginst the machine by shunning the misplaced guilt of being wealthy and successful.

Rand is almost prophetic in her descriptive writing as it compares with our liberal society of today. "It's not fair that some should have so much while others suffer with little." Rubbish...to each according to his ability. Stop looking for handouts!

THERE IS NO SUBSTITUTE FOR HARD WORK. I love this book!